Showing posts with label god-idea. Show all posts
Showing posts with label god-idea. Show all posts
Thursday, December 02, 2010
Short rhyme by multilingual non-theist
C'est mieux sans dieu.
Labels:
atheism,
atheist,
god,
god exist,
god-idea,
non believer,
non-believers,
non-theist
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
The Emperor's clothes
“Daddy what is the Holy Virgin?” my youngest daughter asked me. I explained her that she is Mary, the mother of Jesus. Then she asked: “But she was his mother, how can she be a virgin?”. So I told her that that was just the miracle of the whole thing. She started giggling and asked me if grown-up people really believed that...
Monday, December 01, 2008
Gerard Bodifee
Open letter to Mr. Gerard Bodifee
Dear Sir,
Recently I have been in the audience for your lecture “God and stones: what religion and science speak about and keep silent.”
Either I misunderstood the title or it is deliberately misleading. A better name for your tale should have been something like: “God and stones: the mental splits of a scientist next to his god”.
As engaging and well structured the part of your disquisition was on the cosmos, as woolly was the part on religion. In your thesis on ethics I strongly sensed the human and religious feelings of superiority that for centuries are the cause of a lot of misery.
Why attribute only the good to religion? Religion is nothing more then a safe harbor for the distressful and fearful and is further used by the zealots and the good-willing as hat-stand for their conviction. The same hat-stand as you use for your “religion as basis of ethics”.
Apparently you are a religious man and that's your choice. However to use your status as scientist to bring all sorts of sophisms just to justify your combination of scientist and believer I find ill-suited. It diminishes the alloy of the integrity of the human behind the scientist and believer.
Kind regards,
Circum
(link to Mr.Bodifee's site)
Open brief naar De Heer Gerard Bodifee
Beste heer Bodifee,
Ik ben onlangs toehoorder geweest van uw lezing “God en het gesteente: waarover religie en wetenschap spreken en zwijgen.”
Misschien had ik het òf verkeerd begrepen òf de titel van uw lezing is bewust misleidend. Uw relaas had beter een andere titel kunnen hebben, namelijk zoiets als “God en het gesteente: de mentale spagaat als wetenschapper naast god”
Zo boeiend en gestructureerd als uw uiteenzetting over de kosmos was, zo zweverig was het gedeelte over religie. In uw stelling over ethiek proefde ik zeer sterk het menselijke én religieuze superieuriteitsgevoel en egocentrisme dat al eeuwenlang aan de wieg staat van zoveel miserie.
Waarom enkel het goede aan religie toeschrijven? Religie is niets meer dan een vluchthaven voor de angstigen en verdrietigen en wordt verder door zowel zeloten als hen van goede wil als kapstok gebruikt voor alles wat zij eraan wensen op te hangen. Dezelfde kapstok die u gebruikt voor uw “religie als basis van de ethiek”.
U bent blijkbaar een religieus mens en dat is uw keus. Echter om uw status als wetenschapper te gebruiken om met allerlei drogredenen te komen om uw combinatie van wetenschapper en gelovige te kunnen goedpraten vind ik niet gepast. Dat doet afbreuk aan het allooy van de integriteit van de mens achter de wetenschapper en gelovige.
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Circum
(link naar Dhr.Bodifee's site)
Dear Sir,
Recently I have been in the audience for your lecture “God and stones: what religion and science speak about and keep silent.”
Either I misunderstood the title or it is deliberately misleading. A better name for your tale should have been something like: “God and stones: the mental splits of a scientist next to his god”.
As engaging and well structured the part of your disquisition was on the cosmos, as woolly was the part on religion. In your thesis on ethics I strongly sensed the human and religious feelings of superiority that for centuries are the cause of a lot of misery.
Why attribute only the good to religion? Religion is nothing more then a safe harbor for the distressful and fearful and is further used by the zealots and the good-willing as hat-stand for their conviction. The same hat-stand as you use for your “religion as basis of ethics”.
Apparently you are a religious man and that's your choice. However to use your status as scientist to bring all sorts of sophisms just to justify your combination of scientist and believer I find ill-suited. It diminishes the alloy of the integrity of the human behind the scientist and believer.
Kind regards,
Circum
(link to Mr.Bodifee's site)
Open brief naar De Heer Gerard Bodifee
Beste heer Bodifee,
Ik ben onlangs toehoorder geweest van uw lezing “God en het gesteente: waarover religie en wetenschap spreken en zwijgen.”
Misschien had ik het òf verkeerd begrepen òf de titel van uw lezing is bewust misleidend. Uw relaas had beter een andere titel kunnen hebben, namelijk zoiets als “God en het gesteente: de mentale spagaat als wetenschapper naast god”
Zo boeiend en gestructureerd als uw uiteenzetting over de kosmos was, zo zweverig was het gedeelte over religie. In uw stelling over ethiek proefde ik zeer sterk het menselijke én religieuze superieuriteitsgevoel en egocentrisme dat al eeuwenlang aan de wieg staat van zoveel miserie.
Waarom enkel het goede aan religie toeschrijven? Religie is niets meer dan een vluchthaven voor de angstigen en verdrietigen en wordt verder door zowel zeloten als hen van goede wil als kapstok gebruikt voor alles wat zij eraan wensen op te hangen. Dezelfde kapstok die u gebruikt voor uw “religie als basis van de ethiek”.
U bent blijkbaar een religieus mens en dat is uw keus. Echter om uw status als wetenschapper te gebruiken om met allerlei drogredenen te komen om uw combinatie van wetenschapper en gelovige te kunnen goedpraten vind ik niet gepast. Dat doet afbreuk aan het allooy van de integriteit van de mens achter de wetenschapper en gelovige.
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Circum
(link naar Dhr.Bodifee's site)
Labels:
believers,
gerard bodifee,
god-idea,
philosophy,
proving existence god,
scientist
Thursday, September 25, 2008
Can't you believe in a god and be quiet about it?
That you believe in a god I don't mind, it's your decision. But it annoys me when you bring your god into most conversations and correspondences. It's almost if you are reassuring yourself that your god exists by bringing it up all the time. There is no need to convince me that you believe in a god and it has no added value other then to yourself.
Anyway, that's my belief.
Anyway, that's my belief.
Labels:
acceptance,
atheism,
atheist,
believers,
concept god,
god,
god exist,
god-idea,
non believer,
non-believers,
opium to the masses,
proving existence god,
religion,
the concept god
Saturday, June 21, 2008
The old god is just a fear reflex
It seems that in our society the (individual colored) god image is turning into a methaphore for good ethical behaviour. Can we see this as a sign of our evolution?
Labels:
believers,
concept god,
ethics,
god,
god exist,
god-idea,
lo lishma,
reflections for sabbath
Thursday, June 12, 2008
And I saw, god is product of man
But how do I tell my rabbi? He’s a good guy.
Labels:
atheism,
atheist,
believers,
concept god,
god exist,
god-idea,
non believer,
non-believers,
non-theist,
rabbi,
the concept god
Friday, October 05, 2007
Does your god have a sense of humor?
... just wondering.
Thursday, October 04, 2007
If I was god, I would say: (02)
I AM GOD ALMIGHTY,
BE FRUITFUL AND MULTIPLY
SOLVE YOUR OWN PROBLEMS AND LEAVE ME ALONE!
(P.S. I DON'T EVEN EXIST!)
SOLVE YOUR OWN PROBLEMS AND LEAVE ME ALONE!
(P.S. I DON'T EVEN EXIST!)
Labels:
believers,
concept god,
god,
god exist,
god-idea
Friday, September 14, 2007
Atheists all countries unite!
Power to the people!
Thursday, September 13, 2007
If I was god, I would say: (01)
I AM GOD ALMIGHTY,
BE FRUITFUL AND MULTIPLY
SOLVE YOUR OWN PROBLEMS AND LEAVE ME ALONE!
SOLVE YOUR OWN PROBLEMS AND LEAVE ME ALONE!
(I got real sick of all your moaning, complaining, bootlicking and begging. Especially the glorifying pisses me off as if you see me as a child that needs its self esteem to be lifted up by your compliments.)
Labels:
believers,
concept god,
god,
god exist,
god-idea
Sunday, July 01, 2007
Agnosticism is cowardism
While (most) religious people are sincere in their fallacy, agnostics are believers in doubt keeping up enlightened appearances.
Labels:
absentheist,
agnosticism,
atheism,
atheist,
believers,
god,
god exist,
god-idea,
non believer,
non-believers,
non-theist,
opium to the masses,
philosophy,
religion,
the concept god
Monday, June 11, 2007
Decoding god (or how "god" equals "prozac")
(a=1, b=2, c=3 etc.)
god=7.15.4
7x15x4=420
4+2+0=6
god=6
prozac=16.18+15.26+1.3
288+390+3=681
6+8+1=15
1+5=6
prozac=6
god = 6 = prozac
god = prozac
Labels:
believers,
god,
god-idea,
opium to the masses,
reflections for sabbath,
religion,
the concept god
Sunday, June 10, 2007
Holy shit
(multiple-choice)
"As long as you cannot proof the nonexistence of ........ I will stay a believer."
A) gnomes
B) dragons
C) god
D) hobbits
E) the tooth fairy
A) gnomes
B) dragons
C) god
D) hobbits
E) the tooth fairy
Labels:
believers,
god,
god exist,
god-idea,
philosophy,
religion,
the concept god
Friday, May 25, 2007
Ha ha ha ha
Laughing believer: “Real funny how heathen prove the existence of their god.”
Labels:
believers,
god,
god exist,
god-idea,
proving existence god,
religion,
the concept god
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
In the beginning
Perhaps the god-idea finds it origin in man’s genetic blueprint of a parent model and marks an evolutionary phase between our animalistic past and a rational world to be?
Labels:
god,
god-idea,
in the beginning
Saturday, December 23, 2006
God does exist!
"God does exist."
"God does not exist."
"God does exist."
"God does not exist."
"God does exist."
"Hmmmmm... ok.... let me fetch another flower."
Thursday, December 07, 2006
The concept "god" (04)
... needed thus invented.
Labels:
believers,
god,
god-idea,
opium to the masses,
religion
Friday, November 24, 2006
The concept "god" (02)
...unburdens.
Thursday, October 19, 2006
Monday, October 16, 2006
The concept "god"
Not bad but like other human inventions, subject to severe misuse.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)